Loading
Loading
1 photographsArchive Record FUH-PH8P-W7TY-W
Era undetermined
Reference example
This pipe is documented here as an example for study — it is a record in the archive, not an item offered for sale. Everything below is what the piece itself, and the evidence around it, will honestly support.
Original stem
Yes
Faridunhill standing declaration
Stem replaced or re-cut
No
Faridunhill standing declaration
Rim cleaned (no wood removed)
Yes
Faridunhill standing declaration
Refinished
No
Faridunhill standing declaration
Chamber reamed
Yes
Faridunhill standing declaration
Smoked
Yes
owner stated
Facts, not a grade. We do not score a pipe out of ten: a number would rank a restored pipe above an honest one, and restoration is exactly what this hobby prices down. Every line above is checkable by anyone holding the pipe. Lines marked Faridunhill standing declaration rest on our published, dated statement of shop practice (v1.0, 2026-07-29) — not on an inspection of this individual pipe. It is one document, in public, that you can hold us to.
This reference example documents a Stanwell pipe from the Royal Rouge line, carrying the factory shape number 65 and finished smooth, with a 9mm filter system fitted in the stem — a configuration long characteristic of Continental European pipemaking, where a filter chamber bored into the tenon accepts a disposable charcoal or paper filter of standardised 9mm diameter. The piece entered the archive as a Danish estate pipe, meaning it saw prior use before being catalogued here. Stanwell occupies a central place in the history of the Danish school of pipemaking. Stanwell famously commissioned shapes from the leading independent carvers of the Danish golden age — Sixten Ivarsson, Tom Eltang, Jess Chonowitsch and others — and issued them under a numbered shape system, so that a Stanwell shape number refers to a fixed catalogue design rather than an ad hoc form. Shape 65 belongs to this numbered canon, and the Royal Rouge stamp identifies one of the factory's named finish lines, its designation pointing to the reddish stain family from which the line takes its name. Dating a Stanwell is a matter of context rather than code. The factory never applied year stamps to its pipes, so precision is impossible from markings alone. A piece recorded as a Danish estate therefore sits within that long domestic era, and the honest bracket for this example is Danish production of undetermined year — a wide window, stated plainly, which is the most the evidence supports.
2023-12-26
Logged from the Faridunhill archive — photographed and posted on Instagram, 2023-12-26.
2024-03-28
Sold through eBay for USD 85. No buyer is recorded.
2026-07-29
5 checklist facts recorded under Faridunhill's standing declaration of shop practice (2026-07-29).
2026-08-28
Honesty pass: statements the source does not support were removed (era 'Danish production era, undetermi' -> undetermined; 2 unsupported/absence sentence(s) removed from the essay).
This record is append-only. Nothing is deleted — a correction is a new entry that supersedes the old one, and both stay visible.
USD 85sold 2024-03-28 · eBay
From 1 recorded sale — this pipe, this day. A single transaction is not a market price, and we will never print one as if it were.
The sample this sits in: Faridunhill has recorded 685 sales of Stanwell between 2016–2026 — median $69, most falling between $47 and $125.
The date shown is the date of sale, not the date this page was published. Our own transaction record, published free. No buyer appears here — not a name, not initials, not a country. Counted across both of our channels — eBay 2015–2022 and Etsy 2022–2026 — so the series is continuous and a change of marketplace is never read as a change in price.
Nobody leaves empty-handed. If you hold the catalogue page, the dated advertisement, or a hallmarked sibling that closes one of these — or simply own this model and can measure yours — send it in. Contributions are checked, credited to you by name, and the record is updated with the date it changed.
Instagram post, 2023-12-26. Published to a third-party platform on that date and archived since — a timestamp we cannot move. It is evidence that this object existed and looked like this, then.
The photographs are the identity. 1 images of this pipe's grain, stamping and stem are held as its fingerprint. The handle above is only a handle: lose it, and the pipe can still be matched back to this record from its grain.