Loading
Loading
10 photographsArchive Record FUH-659T-XG8H-D
1948–1960s
Reference example
This pipe is documented here as an example for study — it is a record in the archive, not an item offered for sale. Everything below is what the piece itself, and the evidence around it, will honestly support.
Original stem
Yes
Faridunhill standing declaration
Stem replaced or re-cut
No
Faridunhill standing declaration
Rim cleaned (no wood removed)
Yes
Faridunhill standing declaration
Refinished
No
Faridunhill standing declaration
Chamber reamed
Yes
Faridunhill standing declaration
Smoked
Yes
owner stated
Facts, not a grade. We do not score a pipe out of ten: a number would rank a restored pipe above an honest one, and restoration is exactly what this hobby prices down. Every line above is checkable by anyone holding the pipe. Lines marked Faridunhill standing declaration rest on our published, dated statement of shop practice (v1.0, 2026-07-29) — not on an inspection of this individual pipe. It is one document, in public, that you can hold us to.
This archive entry documents a Danish estate pipe from Stanwell, stamped for the Royal Briar line and bearing the shape number 23. The bowl is briar, as the line's own name declares, and the record preserves the pipe as an example of Stanwell's mid-century production for reference purposes. Stanwell occupies a foundational place in the history of Danish pipe making. Stanwell is particularly noted for commissioning shape designs from leading Danish carvers, and its numbered shape chart — of which this pipe's 23 is one entry — became a defining feature of the marque, allowing individual forms to be identified across finishes and series. The Royal Briar stamping identifies one of the factory's named finish lines applied across that shared shape catalogue. The dating of this example rests on its Regd. No. stamp, read together with the owner-stated bracket. Stanwell registered its design early in its history, and pipes carrying the registered-number marking are conventionally assigned to the company's earlier decades, before that stamping style was retired in favour of later nomenclature. This is a marking-based method of attribution rather than a factory date code: Stanwell, like most makers, did not stamp an explicit year on its pipes, so the era is deduced from which stamps appear and which do not. On that evidence the pipe is honestly placed within the 1948–1960s bracket recorded by its owner, situating it in the formative period when Danish factory pipes were first establishing their international reputation.
2024-04-09
Logged from the Faridunhill archive — photographed and posted on Instagram, 2024-04-09.
2024-05-19
Sold through Etsy for USD 129. No buyer is recorded.
2026-07-29
5 checklist facts recorded under Faridunhill's standing declaration of shop practice (2026-07-29).
2026-08-28
Honesty pass: statements the source does not support were removed (1 unsupported/absence sentence(s) removed from the essay).
This record is append-only. Nothing is deleted — a correction is a new entry that supersedes the old one, and both stay visible.
USD 129sold 2024-05-19 · Etsy
From 1 recorded sale — this pipe, this day. A single transaction is not a market price, and we will never print one as if it were.
The sample this sits in: Faridunhill has recorded 685 sales of Stanwell between 2016–2026 — median $69, most falling between $47 and $125.
The date shown is the date of sale, not the date this page was published. Our own transaction record, published free. No buyer appears here — not a name, not initials, not a country. Counted across both of our channels — eBay 2015–2022 and Etsy 2022–2026 — so the series is continuous and a change of marketplace is never read as a change in price.
Nobody leaves empty-handed. If you hold the catalogue page, the dated advertisement, or a hallmarked sibling that closes one of these — or simply own this model and can measure yours — send it in. Contributions are checked, credited to you by name, and the record is updated with the date it changed.
Instagram post, 2024-04-09. Published to a third-party platform on that date and archived since — a timestamp we cannot move. It is evidence that this object existed and looked like this, then.
The photographs are the identity. 10 images of this pipe's grain, stamping and stem are held as its fingerprint. The handle above is only a handle: lose it, and the pipe can still be matched back to this record from its grain.